Library of Formatting Examples:Italics/06A: Difference between revisions

From Test Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:


== Non-italicized words in between italics ==
== Non-italicized words in between italics ==
it's easy to miss an upright word between two italicized words, like the "and" in the last line here.
it's easy to miss an upright word in the middle of two italicized words, like the "and" in the last line of this example.
{{LOFE:Example end}}
{{LOFE:Example end}}
</div>
</div>

Revision as of 04:51, 3 October 2025

Distributed Proofreaders: Activity Hub · Wiki · Forums · Blog
<< (Italics/05A) Library of Formatting Examples
Italics
(Italics/07A) >>

Page image

101-07A.png

Correctly formatted text

   three sides, it is considered correct to
   describe the contents as <i>ore partly blocked</i>;
   [** semi-colon goes OUTSIDE.]
   for such bodies as are proved upon two
   [** Below, a simple list; mark each item separately.]
   sides only, the terms <i>ore faces</i>, <i>ore developing</i>
   or <i>probable ore</i> are appropriate; while
   in speaking of all ore that may be expected
   or suspected, but which is beyond the last
   exposures, we may use the expressions
   <i>ore expectant</i> and <i>possible ore</i>.

Italicized lists

This example includes a simple in-line list. Mark each "item" in the list separately. The comma and the 'or' are not items in list, and go outside the markups.

Non-italicized words in between italics

it's easy to miss an upright word in the middle of two italicized words, like the "and" in the last line of this example.