Library of Formatting Examples:Italics/06A: Difference between revisions

From Test Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
     {{LOFE:Tag|i}}ore expectant{{LOFE:Tag|/i}} and {{LOFE:Tag|i}}possible ore{{LOFE:Tag|/i}}.
     {{LOFE:Tag|i}}ore expectant{{LOFE:Tag|/i}} and {{LOFE:Tag|i}}possible ore{{LOFE:Tag|/i}}.
{{LOFE:Example middle}}
{{LOFE:Example middle}}
== Italicized lists ==
== Lists ==
This example includes a simple in-line list. Mark each "item" in the list separately. The comma and the 'or' are not items in list, and go '''outside''' the markups.
This example includes a simple in-line list. Mark each "item" in the list separately. The comma and the 'or' are not items in list, and go '''outside''' the markups.



Revision as of 04:59, 3 October 2025

Distributed Proofreaders: Activity Hub · Wiki · Forums · Blog
<< (Italics/05A) Library of Formatting Examples
Italics
(Italics/07A) >>

Page image

101-06A.png

Correctly formatted text

   three sides, it is considered correct to
   describe the contents as <i>ore partly blocked</i>;
   [** semi-colon goes OUTSIDE.]
   for such bodies as are proved upon two
   [** Below, a simple list; mark each item separately.]
   sides only, the terms <i>ore faces</i>, <i>ore developing</i>
   or <i>probable ore</i> are appropriate; while
   in speaking of all ore that may be expected
   or suspected, but which is beyond the last
   exposures, we may use the expressions
   <i>ore expectant</i> and <i>possible ore</i>.

Lists

This example includes a simple in-line list. Mark each "item" in the list separately. The comma and the 'or' are not items in list, and go outside the markups.

Non-italicized words in between italics

it's easy to miss an upright word in the middle of two italicized words, like the "and" in the last line of this example.